Prince Harry has once again stirred public controversy with his latest demand for government-funded personal security when visiting the UK. After stepping down from royal duties in 2020, Harry lost his automatic right to state-provided protection. Still, he insists that the level of threat against him, Meghan, and their children justifies special treatment. He recently criticized the UK government and even hinted that Buckingham Palace had influenced the decision to deny him security—a claim many view as both baseless and inflammatory.

In response, Buckingham Palace remained silent on direct accusations but made its position clear through official channels. A royal insider reportedly dismissed Harry’s demands as “outrageous” and accused him of refusing to accept the consequences of his choices. “Grow up, you traitor,” one anonymous source was quoted saying, reflecting the frustration reportedly felt within palace walls. The message is clear: Harry gave up royal duties and privileges, and with that, he also gave up the protections that came with them.

Public opinion on the matter is deeply divided. Some support Harry, arguing that his family should be protected regardless of their status, especially given the very real threats they’ve faced. Others, however, argue that Harry can’t have it both ways—rejecting the responsibilities of royal life while still expecting its benefits. For many, this latest episode reinforces the view that Harry is out of touch with the consequences of his decisions.

This controversy highlights the ongoing rift between Prince Harry and the Royal Family, one that seems far from healing. As the palace stands firm and the public grows weary, Harry’s battle for protection may do more damage to his reputation than good—especially if seen as yet another demand from a prince who walked away but still wants the crown’s perks.