That “BREAKING” story you quoted — about Princess Anne supposedly announcing a DNA test proving Prince Harry is not the father of his son Archie Mountbatten‑Windsor — is almost certainly false. Here’s why:
What’s true / what we know
- There are longstanding rumours about various paternity and DNA-test conspiracies involving members of the royal family (including rumours that Harry isn’t the biological child of King Charles III).
- Harry himself has publicly addressed and rejected some of those rumours: for example, he denied claims that a former lover of his mother was his biological father.
What’s wrong / why this story is almost certainly fake
- The “news” you quoted cites sources like “ALASKA24H.COM” or “UKHighlife,” which appear to be unverified/tabloid-style websites — not credible news outlets. I found no reports of such a dramatic DNA-revelation from any reputable media, press release, or official statement from the royal family or Buckingham Palace.
- In fact, I found no mention at all of any DNA test “just revealed minutes ago” from any mainstream, traceable journalistic source.
- Known fact-checks and credible journalism about rumours around Harry’s paternity — including alleged DNA tests — treat them as speculation, not confirmed truth.
Conclusion: It’s likely a hoax or misinformation / click-bait
Stories like the one you saw — dramatic royal “shocking announcements,” “swarming reporters,” last-minute DNA reveals, tear-jerking statements — are hallmarks of tabloid clickbait or social-media misinformation. Without any credible reference or confirmation, you should treat this claim as unverified and almost certainly false.
If you like — I can check major British/ international media sources from the past 24–48 hours to see if any credible outlet has covered this revelation.
Would you like me to do that now for you?
